Women and Sexual Harassment in The Workplace
Subject Areas : Research on Iranian social issues
Fereshteh Zamani
1
,
Hoda Hallajzadeh
2
*
,
Fardin Alikhah
3
1 - M.A in Sociology, University of Guilan, Iran.
2 - Assistant Professor of Sociology Department, University Guilan, Iran.
3 - Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Gilan University, Iran.
Keywords: Violence, Sexual harassment, Sexual violence, Working women, Violence against women.,
Abstract :
Women and Sexual Harassment in The Workplace
Fereshteh Zamani*
Hoda Hallajzadeh**
Fardin Alikhah***
This study aims to socially analyze the lived experiences of working women regarding sexual harassment in the workplace. A qualitative research method was employed for this investigation. A total of 31 working women from both formal and informal sectors (judicial and sales professions) in the city of Roudsar were selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured and in-depth interviews and analyzed using open, axial, and selective coding methods. The findings revealed three main forms of sexual harassment: verbal, non-verbal, and physical. Verbal harassment included repeated sexual propositions, persistent requests for mobile phone numbers, unsolicited expressions of affection, threats, and sexual innuendos. Non-verbal harassment involved sexist gestures, acts mimicking sexual behavior, and voyeurism. Physical harassment consisted of inappropriate touching, excessive proximity, and unwanted physical contact. The responses to these incidents varied, including personal avoidance, verbal reprimands, and proactive confrontations. In many cases, women perceived the harassment as normalized by society, while threats from the perpetrators, lack of evidence, and absence of witnesses complicated their ability to seek justice. The consequences of such harassment included psychological distress, social isolation, and a growing distrust of society.
Keywords: Violence, Sexual harassment, Sexual violence, Working women, Violence against women.
Extended abstract
Sexual abuse of women and violence against them have existed as long as the oldest myths (Raisi Sarteshnizi, 2002: 2). Violence against women is not an issue specific to one country or group but occurs across all nationalities, classes, and social groups (Khosravi, 2018: 20). Sexual harassment, one of the manifestations of violence against women and a form of gender discrimination, includes repeated and unilateral verbal and sexual propositions, catcalls, derogatory and implicitly sexual comments, and gender-discriminatory remarks that are distressing for the target, causing a sense of danger, humiliation, intimidation, or suffering (Ahmadi & Biwarani, 2016: 2; Ham & Gambel, 2003: 403). Women, regardless of their socio-economic status, experience sexual harassment, which has significant effects on the victims (Paknahad, 2013: 14). The common feature of all these behaviors is the dissatisfaction of the subject (women) and the harm to their spiritual integrity (Paknahad, 2013: 2).
The central issue of this research is the sexual harassment of working women. The research questions are as follows:
- What is the lived experience of women regarding sexual harassment in the workplace?
- What reactions do working women show to various forms of verbal, non-verbal, and physical sexual harassment in the workplace?
- What type of sexual harassment do working women most often experience in their workplace?
- What are the personal and social consequences of sexual harassment on the lives of working women?
The goal of this study was to understand and interpret working women's experiences of sexual harassment in the workplace and to categorize the types of sexual harassment. Thus, this research was conducted using a qualitative approach and interpretive paradigm, focusing on the lived experience of working women regarding sexual harassment in the workplace. The study population consisted of working women in the city of Rudsar. The inclusion criterion was employment in formal and informal workplaces in Rudsar. The participants were women working in various positions within the judiciary (court staff) and retail jobs. The sampling method was purposive and theoretical, with the selection criterion being at least one year of work experience and consent to participate in the research. The sample size was determined based on theoretical saturation, which reached 31 participants, with 17 working in the judiciary sector and 14 in retail positions.
Data collection was conducted using semi-structured and in-depth interviews. Interviews were conducted with a total of 31 participants. Data collection took place online. The data were analyzed using Colaizzi’s method (1987). Theoretical frameworks such as symbolic interactionism, feminist theory, and social learning theory were influential in guiding the research concerns and were used as references in the data analysis. Based on this process, the following data were extracted: Verbal harassment, such as unsolicited affection (despite the woman’s disinterest and denial), was prevalent in formal workplaces, such as those in the judiciary. The offering of friendship and insistence on it despite the woman's objections, as well as threats if the request was denied, verbal forms of sexual harassment identified in these workplaces. Verbal harassment in the form of insistence on obtaining the woman's phone number despite her disinterest was also common in informal workplaces such as retail. Another form of verbal harassment involved the use of sexual innuendos. This form of harassment was also prevalent in the mentioned work environments. Non-verbal harassment often took the form of lustful and lecherous glances in formal workplaces, such as legal positions. In informal workplaces like retail, it was characterized by pretending to perform sexual acts. Voyeurism and lingering, meaningful gazes were notable examples of non-verbal sexual harassment. Physical sexual harassment included unwarranted proximity to the woman and intentional touching of her body in formal workplaces, such as in legal jobs, and hand-touching in informal workplaces like retail. The harassment of getting too close to the woman was another form of physical harassment present in these environments. In response to verbal sexual harassment, employees in the judiciary sector often preferred to distance themselves from the perpetrator, employ personal behaviors such as becoming serious, giving verbal warnings, and dismissing the harassment as unimportant in front of the harasser. They believed that society does not consider such harassment by men towards women as a social issue, and this behavior is normalized. Other reasons for their responses (distance from the harasser and avoidance of the work environment) included disappointment with the reliability of legal authorities (police and courts) in pursuing such cases, as well as the threat from the harasser, who may hinder the woman’s career success if her request is not accepted. For non-verbal sexual harassment in formal workplaces, women in the judiciary sector often distanced themselves from the harasser, avoided eye contact, and took preventive measures like dressing appropriately at work. They decided not to engage with the harasser again, as they had no evidence to support the harassment. Complaints to legal authorities were seen as ineffective without proof and witnesses. In response to physical sexual harassment in formal workplaces, victims from the judiciary sector preferred to distance themselves from the perpetrator. In informal workplaces, such as retail, when faced with verbal sexual harassment, workers often prefer to discreetly remove the harasser from their environment. They cited fear of societal stigma as the reason for this reaction. Another reason for this response was the fear of retaliation from the harasser if a formal complaint was made. Additionally, the victim would sometimes threaten the harasser with reporting them to the police.
For non-verbal sexual harassment in informal workplaces, retail workers often preferred to react with indifference, such as ignoring the harasser, as they had no proof of the harassment and recognized that legal complaints require witnesses. In response to physical sexual harassment in informal workplaces, retail workers would often confront the harasser directly, removing them from the environment, as they believed that failure to act would make such harassment more widespread. The personal consequences of sexual harassment in formal workplaces included short-term stress and discomfort, along with long-term feelings of doubt, mistrust, and suspicion towards men in society. Social consequences included limiting social relationships in the workplace and a tendency to act coldly when interacting with male colleagues, thus distancing themselves from them. Experiencing sexual harassment in the workplace led to women limiting their work-related social interactions. In informal workplaces, the personal consequences of sexual harassment included persistent feelings of doubt, mistrust, and suspicion towards men in society, which were experienced by many retail workers. The social consequences in retail workplaces included decisions to quit the job and a constant lack of trust when making decisions about choosing a workplace or considering marriage. Although sexual harassment is considered a crime by law, with punishments for the perpetrators, women who are harassed often prefer to react conservatively, modifying their behavior and dress, passively limiting their contact with the harasser and avoiding the workplace. However, women can unite and collectively reject the harasser from their workplace. When women share their harassment experiences with each other, they create a supportive social network, which can act as a shield against future harassment. On the one hand, harassers are identified, and on the other, the awareness of other women about the different forms of sexual harassment is increased. Fear often causes individuals to retreat from their positions, but women can overcome the fear of societal stigma and prioritize their mental and physical well-being, reacting to sexual harassment accordingly. As long as there is no evidence or witnesses to support the harassment, the informal responses mentioned above can be seen as a form of resistance.
References
Ahmadi, Y., & Biwarani, S. (2016) Study of the Effect of Parents' Socio-Cultural Components on Sexual (Street) Harassment of Male Children. Journal of Social Studies and Research in Iran,(5), 3, 436-413.[in Persian]
Ham, M., & Gambel, S. (2003) Culture of Feminist Theories, translated by Firoozeh Mohajer et al. Tehran: Tose'e Publications. [in Persian]
Khosravi, Khalil (2018) Sexual crimes against women in the international arena, edited by Negar Jafari, Tehran, Qonunyar. [in Persian]
Paknahad, Amir (2013) "Criminal-legal analysis of sexual harassment", Criminal Law Research Journal, fourth year, number 2, pp. 7-13. [in Persian]
Raisi Sarteshnizi, Amrullah (2002) "Violence against women and factors affecting it (case study: Shahrekord city)", Women's Research Quarterly, No. 3, pp. 45-66. [in Persian]
* M.A in Sociology, University of Guilan, Iran.
** Corresponding Author: Assistant Professor of Sociology Department, University Guilan, Iran.
hhz_72@yahoo.com
*** Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Gilan University, Iran.
آبوت، پاملا و کلر والاس (1380) جامعهشناسی زنان، ترجمه منیژه نجم عراقی، تهران، نشرنی.
احمدی، یعقوب و سیما بیورانی (1395) «مطالعة اثر مؤلفههای اجتماعی- فرهنگی والدین بر مزاحمت جنسی (خیابانی) فرزندان پسر»، مطالعات و تحقيقات اجتماعي در ایران، دوره پنجم، شماره 3، صص 413-436.
احمدی بفروئی، علی (1400) «تبیین آزار جنسی در محیط کار و روشهای پیشگیری از آن»، نخستین کنفرانس ملی آسیبهای اجتماعی و روانی با تأکید بر علوم رفتاری ، دانشگاه پیام نور مرکز خرامه.
اعزازی، شهلا (1383) «ساختار جامعه و خشونت علیه زنان»، ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﺔ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ- ﭘﮋﻭﻫﺸﻲ ﺭﻓﺎﻩ ﺍﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ، ﺳﺎﻝ چهارم، شماره 14، صص 59-96.
پاکنهاد، امیر (1392) «ﺗﺤﻠﻴﻞ ﺣﻘﻮﻗﻲ- ﺟﺮم¬ﺷﻨﺎﺧﺘﻲ ﻣﺰاﺣﻤﺖ ﺟﻨﺴﻲ»، پژوهشنامه حقوقی کیفری، سال چهارم، شماره 2، صص 7-13.
توسلی، غلامعباس (1373) نظریههای جامعهشناسی، قم، سمت.
خسروی، خلیل (1397) جرایم جنسی علیه زنان در عرصه بینالملل، ویراستۀ نگار جعفری، تهران، قانونیار.
دانشگر، شیرین و دیگران (1402) «آزار جنسی؛ ابزار تداوم نابرابری قدرت در فضای کاری (مطالعۀ تجربۀ زنان مدیر میانی در شرکتهای زیرمجموعۀ وزارت صمت)»، فصلنامه مسائل اجتماعی ایران، سال چهاردهم، شماره 2، صص 129-164.
ریاحی، محمداسماعیل و خدیجه پورالماسی (1398) «بررسی جامعهشناختی تجربه مزاحمت جنسی زنان در محیط کار (آزمون تجربی نظریه فعالیتهای روزمره)»، ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﺔ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ- ﭘﮋوﻫﺸﻲ رﻓﺎه اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ، سال نوزدﻫﻢ، ﺷﻤﺎره 72، صص 91-130.
ریتزر، جورج (1389) نظریۀ جامعهشناسی در دوران معاصر، ترجمه محسن ثلاثی، تهران، علمی.
---------- (1393) نظریۀ جامعهشناسی، تهران، نشرنی.
رئیسی سرتشنیزی، امرالله (1381) «خشونت علیه زنان و عوامل مؤثر بر آن (مطالعه موردی: شهرستان شهرکرد)»، فصلنامه پژوهش زنان، شماره 3، صص 45-66.
سازمان بهداشت جهانی (1380) خشونت علیه زنان، ترجمه شهرام رفیعی فر و سعید پارسینیا، تهران، تندیس.
سراجزاده، سید حسین و دیگران (1394) «پوشش زنان و احساس امنیت در فضاهای عمومی»، مطالعات اجتماعی ایران، شماره 2، صص 148-149.
سلیمی، علی و محمد داوری (1385) جامعهشناسی کجروی، قم، پژوهشکده حوزه و دانشگاه.
شکری، کبری و سید ضیاء هاشمی (1393) «بررسی جامعهشناختی آزار جنسی زنان جوان»، قابل دسترسی در: www.
sid.
ir.
صادقی فسایی، سهیلا و مهسا لاریجانی (1389) «مطالعه جامعهشناختی آزار جنسی زنان در محیط کار»، زن در توسعه و سیاست (پژوهش زنان)، دوره هشتم، شماره 3، صص 111-134.
----------------------------- (1392) «آزار جنسی زنان در محیط کار، تهدیدی بر امنیت اجتماعی»، مجله مطالعات اجتماعی ایران، دوره هفتم، شماره 2، صص 87-111.
ﻋﻠﻴﻮرديﻧﻴﺎ، اکبر و مرجان حبیبی (1394) «بررسی نگرش دانشجویان پسر نسبت به خشونت علیه زنان در بستر خانواده: آزمون تجربی نظریه یادگیری اجتماعی ایکرز»، پژوهشهای راهبردی امنیت و نظم اجتماعی، سال چهارم، شماره 3 (پیاپی 11)، صص15-38.
فریدمن، جین (1381) فمینیسم، ترجمه فیروزه مهاجر، تهران، آشیان.
فلیک، اووه (1387) درآمدی بر تحقیق کیفی، ترجمه هادی جلیلی، تهران، نشرنی.
گرت، استفانی (1396) جامعهشناسی جنسیت، ترجمه کتایون بقایی، تهران، نشرنی.
گنجینیا، حسین و دیگران (1399) «چگونگی وضعیت آزار و اذیت جنسی زنان در محیط کار»، ششمین کنفرانس بینالمللی ترفندهای مدرن مدیریت، حسابداری، اقتصاد و بانکداری با رویکرد رشد کسب¬وکارها، تهران.
لطفی خاچکی، طاهره و محمداسماعیل ریاحی (1395) «تحلیل اجتماعی مزاحمتهای خیابانی و واکنشهای انفعالی دختران نسبت به آن (مطالعه موردی: دانشجویان دختر دانشگاه مازندران)»، ﻓﺼﻠﻨﺎﻣﺔ ﻋﻠﻤﻲ- ﭘﮋوﻫﺸﻲ رﻓﺎه اﺟﺘﻤﺎﻋﻲ، سال شانزدﻫﻢ، ﺷﻤﺎره 60، صص231-261.
مکتوبیان، مریم و دیگران (1394) «بیان مدلی دادهبنیاد برای بررسی جامعهشناختی آزار جنسی و احساس ناامنی زنان در بیمارستانها»، بررسی مسائل اجتماعی ایران، دوره ششم، شماره 1، صص 151-192.
مکتوبیان، مریم و علی ربانی خوراسگانی (1393) «چگونگی آزار جنسی زنان در محیط کار: بهکارگیری روششناسی کیفی نظریه داده-بنیاد برای بررسی احساس ناامنی زنان در محیط کار»، پژوهشهای راهبردی امنیت و نظم اجتماعی، سال سوم، شماره اول (پیاپی 7)، صص 61-78.
مولاوردی، شهیندخت (1393) موازین بین¬المللی حقوق زنان، تهران، دانشگاه تهران.
هام، م و گمبل، سارا (1382) فرهنگ نظریه های فمینیستی، ترجمه نوشین احمدی خراسانی، فیروزه مهاجر و فرخ قرداغی، تهران، توسعه.
Bostock, James G & Deborah J. (2007) Daley / Lifetime and Current Sexual Assault and Harassment Victimization Rates of Active-Duty United States Air Force Women, Violence Against Women Volume 13 Number, 927-944.
Einarsen Stail, H. D. Z. H., Cooper L Cary (2011) Bullying Harassment in the Workplace. nternational Standard Book.
Goldberg, A. Toto, J. Kulp, H. Lloyd, M. Gaughan, J. Seamon, M. Charles. (2010) “An Analysis of Inner-City Students’ Attitudes Towards Violence before Andafter Participation in the ‘‘Cradle to Grave’’ Program”. Journal of Injury, Int. J. Care Injured. Vol. 41, p. 110–115.
Krista, S. H. J. (1986) “Theory of Tort liability for Sexual Harassment in the Workplace.” University of Pennsylvania law Review: 134-141.
Noah, Y. (2008) “Experience of Sexual Harassment at Work by Female Employer in Nigerian work Environment.” International NGO Jornal 3(7): 122-127.
Stafford, Jane; Awne Vogt, Tamara A. Bruce , Amy E. Street (2007) Attitudes Toward Women and Tolerance for Sexual Harassment Among Reservists, Violence Against Women Volume 13 Number, 879-900.
Schneider, K. T., Swan, S., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997) Job-related and psychological effects of sexual harassment in the workplace: Empirical evidence from two organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 401-415.