Perceived Barriers to Childbearing: A Qualitative Study of Cultural, Social, and Familial Factors Among Religiously Observant Women Active in Virtual Spaces
Subject Areas : پژوهش مسائل اجتماعی ایران
1 - Ph.D. Student in Demography, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Keywords: Interpretive phenomenology, Lived experience, Religious women, Childbearing, Structural barriers, Family dynamics.,
Abstract :
Perceived Barriers to Childbearing: A Qualitative Study of Cultural, Social, and Familial Factors Among Religiously Observant Women
Active in Virtual Spaces
Mohammad Salimi*
In the context of the demographic and social transformations of contemporary Iran, developing a deep understanding of women’s lived experiences of childbearing has become increasingly significant. This study aimed to explore and interpret the lived experiences of religious women active on social media regarding the factors, barriers, and consequences shaping their decisions about childbearing. Employing a qualitative research design with an interpretive phenomenological approach, the study used purposive and snowball sampling to recruit 32 religiously observant women who were active on social media platforms. Data were collected through in-depth, semi-structured interviews until theoretical saturation was achieved. Thematic analysis, following Braun and Clarke’s multi-stage procedure, was applied to the data encompassing initial coding, theme extraction, and the development of final themes. The analysis revealed three core themes derived from participants’ lived experiences: (1) perceptions of inadequate social support within their relational networks; (2) structural, economic, and social barriers to childbearing; and (3) uncertainty about the future and sense of lack of control over it. The lived experiences of highly religious women regarding childbearing emerged as a complex and multifaceted phenomenon, situated within the tension between traditional-religious values and the contemporary social and economic realities of modern life. Despite their strong commitment to the maternal role, participants reported postponing or avoiding childbearing due to insufficient supportive structures, economic insecurities, and anxiety about the future. These findings underscore the importance of integrating structural and supportive dimensions of childbearing with women’s lived experiences in the formulation of effective population and family policies.
Keyword: Interpretive phenomenology; Lived experience; Religious women; Childbearing; Structural barriers; Family dynamics.
Introduction
Over the past four decades, Iran has experienced two distinct approaches to demographic policy: first, fertility-limiting policies following the 1986 census, and second, a shift toward pro-natalist policies from the early 2010s in response to declining fertility and the accelerating aging of the population. Despite the enactment of high-level policy documents, supportive laws, and practical incentives, the country’s fertility rate has remained below replacement level, reaching 1.44 children per woman in 2024. This is in contrast to the higher reported ideal number of children in Iranian society, and the mean age at first childbirth has increased significantly over the past three decades. This situation highlights the gap between policy objectives and the lived fertility practices of individuals. From the perspective of the sociology of religion and family, it is expected that religiously observant women, due to cultural and religious values that support motherhood and generational continuity, would show greater alignment with pro-natalist policies. However, existing evidence points to a behavioral paradox: some highly religious women, despite their beliefs and value-based inclinations, delay or forgo childbearing in practice. This study, by focusing on the concept of “perceived barriers” and adopting a phenomenological approach, problematizes the disjunction between religious belief and fertility behavior within the lifeworld of religious women, situated in the context of contemporary social, cultural, and discursive transformations in Iran
Literature Review
The review of existing literature indicates that religiosity, as a significant socio-cultural factor, is generally associated with higher fertility attitudes and intentions. Both domestic and international studies suggest that religious beliefs, spiritual experiences, and participation in religious practices can enhance the desire for childbearing by reinforcing family-centered values, imbuing parenthood with meaning, and reducing the perceived costs and challenges of childrearing. Empirical evidence from Iran similarly demonstrates that religiosity, in many instances even more than gendered attitudes, is positively correlated with fertility intentions, with women holding stronger religious convictions reporting higher ideal numbers of children. However, the scholarly literature emphasizes that the relationship between religiosity and fertility is neither simple nor linear. Meta-analyses, qualitative, and quantitative studies show that the influence of religiosity often operates within a complex interplay with economic, structural, social, and psychological barriers, and in many cases, these barriers can diminish or neutralize the effect of religiosity. Within this context, the concept of “perceived barriers” assumes particular significance; that is, women’s subjective interpretations of conditions such as economic insecurity, concerns about their child’s future, perceived inadequacy in fulfilling maternal roles, social pressures, and role conflicts can have a greater impact on fertility decisions than the objective presence of these challenges. Studies grounded in rational choice and planned behavior theories further indicate that religiosity primarily shapes fertility intentions by influencing attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control, yet the translation of these intentions into actual childbearing depends on contextual conditions and the actors’ phenomenological interpretations. Moreover, recent research highlights the role of cyberspaces and exposure to conflicting discourses in redefining women’s attitudes and priorities, particularly among religious women. According to the conceptual framework of the present study is anchored in the interaction among religiosity, perceived barriers, and the lifeworld of religious women. It posits that the “behavioral silence or suspension in fertility” is not the result of an absence of religious values, but rather emerges from women’s meaning-making processes regarding economic, social, cultural, and discursive obstacles within contemporary life—especially in the context of digital activism and engagement in virtual spaces.
Theoretical Considerations
This study employs an integrative, multilevel conceptual
framework to elucidate the barriers to childbearing among religious women, taking into account the interplay of macro-, meso-, and micro-level factors in the fertility decision-making process. At the macro level, value and cultural transformations conceptualized in the Second Demographic Transition theory, alongside economic conditions and rational calculations related to human capital, elucidate the structural and cultural contexts underpinning reduced fertility intentions. These transformations, interacting with the religious value system, create a complex decision-making field for religious women. At the meso level, social networks and norms—mediated through family, religious groups, peers, and particularly digital spaces—shape women’s perceptions of the benefits and barriers of childbearing. These networks, by generating norms, role models, and social support, can act as both facilitators and inhibitors in fertility-related decisions. In the micro level, cognitive and psychological processes—especially attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, and parental self-efficacy—play a central role in shaping fertility intentions and behavioral suspension. Religious interpretations and the degree of practical adherence to beliefs directly influence these components. This framework, by emphasizing the dynamic interaction across different levels and the role of perceived uncertainty about the future, demonstrates that the shortcomings of demographic policies are less a consequence of insufficient incentives and more the result of neglecting this multidimensional, contextually grounded interplay
Method
This study was conducted using a qualitative approach, employing descriptive phenomenology. The aim of this approach is to understand and describe the lived experiences of religious women regarding their perceived barriers to childbearing within the context of contemporary life and digital spaces. The universe of study comprised married and unmarried women with overt religious beliefs who were active in virtual spaces and, despite a potential inclination toward childbearing, had postponed or abstained from it. Purposeful sampling followed by snowball sampling was employed, resulting in a total of 32 participants. Selection criteria included self-reported religiosity, active engagement on cyberspace (Instagram or Telegram) producing content & posts related to religious or Islamic lifestyle topics, and experience of postponing or forgoing childbearing. Variation in levels of religiosity and types of online engagement allowed for the representation of multiple voices. Data collection continued until theoretical saturation was reached. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis following the approach of Braun and Clarke.
Findings
The qualitative analysis of interview data led to the identification of three overarching themes that reflect the perceptions and lived experiences of religious women regarding barriers to childbearing. The first theme, “Perceived Lack of Social Support,” encompasses experiences such as fear of loneliness in performing parental roles, the embodied and psychological suffering associated with motherhood, and a sense of stagnation in personal and social growth. Participants perceived childbearing, in the absence of effective familial, institutional, and social support, as a draining and individualized experience. Second theme, “Childbearing-Inhibiting Ecosystem,” captures women’s lived experiences of the heavy costs and obligations of childbearing, perceptions of inadequate social backing, and concerns about environmental and societal risks. Within this framework, childbearing is not merely an individual choice but is experienced as a high-risk endeavor within an insecure and unsupportive structural context. Third theme, “Ambiguity and Lack of Control over the Future,” involves feelings of a lack of control over economic conditions and anxiety regarding normative and value-based ruptures in the next generation. This sense of ambiguity, as one of the most salient perceived barriers, plays a pivotal role in the postponement or suspension of childbearing decisions. Findings indicate that the silence or suspension of reproductive behavior among religious women is not a consequence of weakened religious beliefs, but rather emerges from their meaningful interpretation of a complex set of social, structural, and psychological barriers within the contemporary lifeworld.
Discussion
The findings of this study reveal a profound transformation in the identity and meaning-making patterns of highly religious women in Iranian society—a transformation that can be interpreted as a shift from “motherhood as destiny” to “motherhood as deliberate choice.” Phenomenological analysis indicates that, for contemporary religious women, the selection of maternal roles at younger ages is no longer a taken-for-granted or predetermined trajectory, as it was for previous generations; rather, it is a reflective act situated within structural uncertainties, existential calculations, and complex semantic evaluations. This condition signifies the emergence of a reflexive subject who continuously reinterprets motherhood even within the framework of religious beliefs. Findings also indicate the formation of a meaningful gap between traditional discourse on maternal responsibility and women’s lived experiences of role accumulation, lack of support, and structural incongruities. This gap has led to a kind of crisis of meaning at the intersubjective level, wherein traditional semantic structures lose their capacity to respond adequately to novel existential conditions. Within this framework, hesitation or suspension in childbearing is not an irrational act, but rather a hermeneutic and cautious response to economic, social, and embodied uncertainties. According to the study’s results, childbearing among religious women is not merely a demographic or economic issue, but an existential and phenomenological concern, shaped at the levels of meaning, identity, and lifeworld. Consequently, the failure of demographic policies is less a result of insufficient incentives and more a consequence of neglecting women’s lived experiences and the absence of a family-centered and intersubjective approach in policy-making. The findings underscore the necessity of shifting from unidimensional demographic policies to strategies that, by reconstructing a safe lifeworld, strengthening supportive networks, fostering active husband participation, and redefining the meaning of responsible motherhood, enable the translation of religious values into actual reproductive practice
References
Abbasi, A., Sadeghi,R. , Maleki,A. and Balakhani,G. (2022). A meta-analysis of factors related to fertility attitudes, desires, and childbearing intentions in Iranian studies. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 14(4), 63-92.
doi: 10.22035/isih.2021.4546.4509
Afshani, S. A., Abouei, A., & Rouhani, A. (2022). Lived experiences of
infertile women regarding childlessness. Women in Development and Politics, 20(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.22059/jwdp.2021.327319.1008049 [In Persian]
Ajzen, I. (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ajzen, I., & Klobas, J. (2013). Fertility intentions. Demographic Research, 29, 203–232. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2013.29.8
Alomair, N., Alageel, S., Davies, N., & Bailey, J. V. (2020) Factors influencing sexual and reproductive health of Muslim women: A systematic review. Reproductive Health, 17(1), 33 . https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-0888-1
Bandura, A. (1997) Self- efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
Behjati-Ardakani, Z., Navabakhsh, M., & Hosseini, S. H. (2017). Sociological Study on the Transformation of Fertility and Childbearing Concept in Iran. Journal of reproduction & infertility, 18(1), 153–161. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5359852/
Bein, C., Mynarska, M., & Gauthier, A. H. (2021) Do costs and benefits of children matter for religious people? Perceived consequences of parenthood and fertility intentions in Poland. Journal of Biosocial Science, 53(3), 419–435.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932020000280.
Brainerd, E., & Malkova, O. (2025) How religion mediates the fertility response to maternity benefits. IZA Institute of Labor Economics. https://www.iza.org/en/publications/dp/18081/how-religion-mediates-the-fertility-response-to-maternity-benefits
Creswell, J. W. (2013) Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?ReferenceID=1807302
Dantis, C., Rizzi, E. L., & Baudin, T. (2023). The Association between Religiosity and Fertility Intentions Via Grandparenting: Evidence from GGS Data. European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie, 39(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-023-09652-9
Hawkey, A. J., Ussher, J. M., & Perz, J. (2018) "If you don't have a baby, you can't be in our culture": Migrant and refugee women's experiences and constructions of fertility and fertility control. Women's Reproductive Health, 5(2), 75- 98. https://doi.org/10.1080/23293691.2018.1463728
Hayford, S. R., & Morgan, S. P. (2008) Religiosity and Fertility in the United States: The Role of Fertility Intentions. Social forces; a scientific medium of social study and interpretation, 86(3), 1163–1188. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0000
Heinämaa, S. (2024). Existential-Phenomenological Insights into Collective Intentionality. Australasian Philosophical Review, 8(2), 139–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/24740500.2024.2485530
Jalal Abbasi-Shavazi, M., & McDonald, P. (2006). FERTILITY DECLINE IN THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN: 1972–2000. Asian Population Studies, 2(3), 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730601073789
Kaveh Firooz, Z., Abbasi-Shavazi, M. J., Serajzadeh, S. H., & Ramzi, N. (2021). The relationship between religiosity and family values with fertility intentions and desires among married women in Tehran. Iranian Journal of Social Studies and Research, 10(2), 587–623. https://doi.org/10.22059/jisr.2020.302336.1064 [In Persian]
Kearney, A. L., & White, K. M. (2016) Examining the psychosocial determinants of women's decisions to delay childbearing. Human Reproduction, 31(8), 1776- 1787. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew124
Khadivzadeh, T., & Irani, M. (2018). The relationship between religious beliefs and fertility behaviors among women of reproductive age in Mashhad (2016). Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, 28(167), 133– 144. http://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/article-1- 10531-fa.html [In Persian]
Khadivzadeh, T., & Irani, M. (2018). The relationship between religious beliefs and fertility behaviors among women of reproductive age in Mashhad (2016). Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, 28(167), 133– 144. http://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/article-1- 10531-fa.html [In Persian]
Lee, J., Kim, S., & Nam, S. H. (2025) "Living with silence and shame": A meta- synthesis of women's lived experiences of infertility- related stigma. International Journal of Women's Health, 17, 1- 15. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S539531
Lesthaeghe, R. (2010) The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 36(2), 211–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x
Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance. (2023). National survey of Iranian values and attitudes (2023). Research Institute for Culture, Art, and Communication, National Projects Office .[In Persian]
Modiri, F. (2017). A comparative study of the effects of religiosity and gender attitudes on fertility intentions by gender in Tehran. Social Welfare and Development Planning, 8(32). https://doi.org/10.22054/qjsd.2017.8429 [In Persian]
Murdock, Kyle. (2012) An Examination of Parental Self- Efficacy Among Mothers and Fathers. Psychology of Men & Masculinity. 14. 314- 323. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0027009
Rivedal, S., Groven, K. S., & Aasbø, G. (2025) Working mothers' bodily and temporal experiences of caring for small children: A phenomenological study of the mommy- body. NORA- Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 33(1), 1- 14. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2025.2550420 .
Safari-Faramani, R., Haghdoost, A. A., Baneshi, M. R., & Dehnavieh, R. (2018). Exploring the perception of childbearing barriers in a low fertility subgroup of Iran: a qualitative study. Electronic physician, 10(6), 6927–6934. https://doi.org/10.19082/6927
Taleb Ardakani, R., Zare, B., Safari-Shali, R., & Karimi, A. (2024). The role of religiosity in transformations of social hope among Tehran citizens. Research of Deviance and Social Problems, 3(8), 71–103. https://risi.ihss.ac.ir/fa/Article/46799 [In Persian]
Vignoli, D., Guetto, R., Bazzani, G., Pirani, E., & Minello, A. (2020) A reflection on economic uncertainty and fertility in Europe: The Narrative Framework. European Journal of Population, 36(4), 743–768. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-020-00094-3
Wittkowski, A., Garrett, C., Calam, R., & Weisberg, D. (2017) Self- report measures of parental self- efficacy: A systematic review of the current literature. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(11), 2960–2978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826- 017- 0830- 5 .
Yadollahpour, M. H., Bakouei, F., Khafri, S., & Salimi, T. (2024). Religiosity and attitudes toward childbearing among Iranian college students: A cross-sectional study. Current Research in Medical Sciences, 1(1), 15-22. http://crms.mubabol.ac.ir/article-1-193-en.html
* Ph.D. Student in Demography, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
salimi.mohammad@ut.ac.ir
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9167-7177
افشانی، سیدعلیرضا و آزاده ابویی و علی روحانی (1401) تجربۀ زیستۀ زنان نابارور از مسئلۀ بیفرزندی، زن در توسعه و سیاست، 20(1)، صص 1-21.
https://doi.org/10.22059/jwdp.2021.327319.1008049.
تاجبخش، غلامرضا (۱۴۰۲) «کاوشی در فهم تجربه زیسته زوجین از فرزندآوری در استان لرستان»، پژوهش انحرافات و مسائل اجتماعی، سال سوم، شماره ۸، صص 135- ۱۶۶.
https://risi.ihss.ac.ir/Article/46195.
خدیوزاده، طلعت و مروارید ایرانی (۱۳۹۷) «ارتباط بین باورهای دینی و رفتارهای باروری در زنان سنین باروری شهر مشهد در سال ۱۳۹۵»، مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مازندران، 28(167)، صص 133-144.
http://jmums.mazums.ac.ir/article--10531-fa.html.
شاوردي، توران و رضا صحراگرد منفرد (۱۴۰۱) «آسیبشناسی تأثیر استفاده از شبکههای اجتماعی بر دینداری دختران و زنان»، پژوهش انحرافات و مسائل اجتماعی، سال دوم، شماره ۴، صص ۳۵- ۶۱.
https://risi.ihss.ac.ir/Article/38481/FullText.
طالبی اردکانی، رها و بیژن زارع و رضا صفریشالی و علیرضا کریمی (۱۴۰3) «جایگاه دینداری در تغییرات امید اجتماعی شهروندان تهرانی»، پژوهش انحرافات و مسائل اجتماعی، ۳(۸)، صص ۷۱-۱۰۳.
https://risi.ihss.ac.ir/fa/Article/46799.
کاوه فیروز، زینب و محمدجلال عباسی شوازی و سیدحسین سراجزاده و نگار رمضی (1400) رابطۀ دینداری و ارزشهای خانواده با تمایلات و قصد فرزندآوری در میان زنان متأهل شهر تهران. مطالعات و تحقیقات اجتماعی در ایران، 10(2)، صص 587-623.
doi: 10.22059/jisr.2020.302336.1064.
مدیری، فاطمه (1396) «بررسی مقایسهای تأثیر دین¬داری و نگرشهای جنسیتی بر قصد فرزندآوری به تفکیک جنسیت در شهر تهران»، برنامه¬ریزی رفاه و توسعه اجتماعی، ۸(۳۲).
وزارت فرهنگ و ارشاد اسلامی (1402) پیمایش ملی ارزشها و نگرشهای ایرانیان 1402، پژوهشگاه فرهنگ، هنر و ارتباطات، دفتر طرحهای ملی.
Abbasi, A., Sadeghi, R., Maleki, A., & Balakhani, G. (2022) A meta- analysis of factors related to fertility attitudes, desires, and childbearing intentions in Iranian studies. Interdisciplinary Studies in the Humanities, 14(4), 63- 92.
doi: 10.22035/isih.2021.4546.4509.
Ajzen, I., & Klobas, J. (2013). Fertility intentions. Demographic Research, 29, 203–232. https://doi.org/10.4054/demres.2013.29.8.
Jalal Abbasi-Shavazi, M., & McDonald, P. (2006). FERTILITY DECLINE IN THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN: 1972–2000. Asian Population Studies, 2(3), 217–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441730601073789.
Ajzen, I. (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T. Alomair, N., Alageel, S., Davies, N., & Bailey, J. V. (2020) Factors influencing sexual and reproductive health of Muslim women: A systematic review. Reproductive Health, 17(1), 33.
. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-0888-1.
Bandura, A. (1997) Self- efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
Becker, G. S. (1991) A treatise on the family (Enlarged ed.). Harvard University Press.
.https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1258277.
Bein, C., Mynarska, M., & Gauthier, A. H. (2021) Do costs and benefits of children matter for religious people? Perceived consequences of parenthood and fertility intentions in Poland. Journal of Biosocial Science, 53(3), 419–435. https://doi:10.1017/S0021932020000280.
Bourdieu, P. (1986) The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood.
https://www.marxists.org/reference/subject/philosophy/works/fr/bourdieu-forms-capital.htm.
Brainerd, E., & Malkova, O. (2025) How religion mediates the fertility response to maternity benefits. IZA Institute of Labor Economics.
https://www.iza.org/en/publications/dp/18081/how-religion-mediates-the-fertility-response-to-maternity-benefits.
Creswell, J. W. (2013) Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
https://www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers?ReferenceID=1807302.
Dantis, C., Rizzi, E. L., & Baudin, T. (2023). The Association between Religiosity and Fertility Intentions Via Grandparenting: Evidence from GGS Data.
European journal of population = Revue europeenne de demographie, 39(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680- 023- 09652- 9.
Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and self- identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford University Press.
Hawkey, A. J., Ussher, J. M., & Perz, J. (2018) "If you don't have a baby, you can't be in our culture": Migrant and refugee women's experiences and constructions of fertility and fertility control. Women's Reproductive Health, 5(2), 75- 98.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23293691.2018.1463728.
Hayford, S. R., & Morgan, S. P. (2008) Religiosity and Fertility in the United States: The Role of Fertility Intentions. Social forces; a scientific medium of social study and interpretation, 86(3), 1163–1188. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0000.
Kearney, A. L., & White, K. M. (2016) Examining the psychosocial determinants of women's decisions to delay childbearing. Human Reproduction, 31(8), 1776- 1787.
https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dew124.
Lee, J., Kim, S., & Nam, S. H. (2025) "Living with silence and shame": A meta- synthesis of women's lived experiences of infertility- related stigma. International Journal of Women's Health, 17, 1- 15. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S539531.
Lesthaeghe, R. (2010) The unfolding story of the second demographic transition. Population and Development Review, 36(2), 211–251.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2010.00328.x .
Merleau- Ponty, M. (1962) Phenomenology of perception (C. Smith, Trans.). Routledge. (Original work published 1945).
https://voidnetwork.gr/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Phenomenology-of-Perception-by-Maurice-Merleau-Ponty.pdf.
Murdock, Kyle. (2012) An Examination of Parental Self- Efficacy Among Mothers and Fathers. Psychology of Men & Masculinity. 14. 314- 323.
https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0027009 .
Rivedal, S., Groven, K. S., & Aasbø, G. (2025) Working mothers' bodily and temporal experiences of caring for small children: A phenomenological study of the mommy- body. NORA- Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 33(1), 1- 14. https://doi.org/10.1080/08038740.2025.2550420.
Vignoli, D., Guetto, R., Bazzani, G., Pirani, E., & Minello, A. (2020) A reflection on economic uncertainty and fertility in Europe: The Narrative Framework. European Journal of Population, 36(4), 743–768.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-020-00094-3.
Wittkowski, A., Garrett, C., Calam, R., & Weisberg, D. (2017) Self- report measures of parental self- efficacy: A systematic review of the current literature. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26(11), 2960–2978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826- 017- 0830- 5.
Yadollahpour, M. H., Bakouei, F., Khafri, S., & Salimi, T. (2024). Religiosity and attitudes toward childbearing among Iranian college students: A cross-sectional study. Current Research in Medical Sciences, 1(1), 15-22.
http://crms.mubabol.ac.ir/article-1-193-en.html.
Safari-Faramani, R., Haghdoost, A. A., Baneshi, M. R., & Dehnavieh, R. (2018). Exploring the perception of childbearing barriers in a low fertility subgroup of Iran: a qualitative study. Electronic physician, 10(6), 6927–6934. https://doi.org/10.19082/6927.
Behjati-Ardakani, Z., Navabakhsh, M., & Hosseini, S. H. (2017). Sociological Study on the Transformation of Fertility and Childbearing Concept in Iran. Journal of reproduction & infertility, 18(1), 153–161. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5359852/.